Abstract
“Just put it in super” has become a common shorthand in Australian financial advice, reflecting superannuation’s long-standing tax advantages and central role in retirement planning. While superannuation is often an effective and appropriate strategy, defaulting to it without sufficient consideration of a client’s broader circumstances can create ethical and regulatory risk. Tax efficiency alone does not satisfy an adviser’s obligations under the best interests duty or the Financial Planners and Advisers Code of Ethics.
This article examines the ethical limits of the “just put it in super” mindset, exploring how familiarity and administrative convenience can displace professional judgement. It considers common scenarios where superannuation recommendations may be technically sound but inappropriate in practice, including liquidity constraints, estate planning complexity, contribution limits and legislative risk. The article highlights how an over-reliance on tax outcomes can undermine the requirement to provide advice that is genuinely appropriate, balanced and client-centred.
Drawing on regulatory guidance and professional standards, the article outlines an ethical framework for superannuation advice that emphasises judgement over habit. It demonstrates how advisers can move beyond default thinking by clarifying client objectives, assessing constraints, comparing alternatives, explaining trade-offs and documenting reasoning. Ultimately, the article argues that superannuation should remain a considered recommendation (not a reflex) within a professional advice framework that prioritises long-term client outcomes over shorthand solutions
Download the full article:
Just Put It in Super – The Ethical Limits of a Popular Strategy
